
Go backward to References
Go up to Top
Footnotes
- (1)
- The coordinator's preference here would
be to use `P(...)' for input and display as
`P(...)'; but objections have been raised about this
confusing the intension of a predicate with its extension (which is
indeed an element of the indicated power set, according to the CASL
semantics). Other rejected alternative include `...->? true',
`...-> truth', and just listing the argument sorts (separated
by `×' or by some neutral symbol such as `<>').
- (2)
- We should perhaps avoid the terminology
`existential equation' in the Summary, as it could get confused with
existential quantification.
CoFI
Document: CASL/SyntaxIssues --Version 0.99-- 17 February 1998.
Comments to cofi-language@brics.dk
