Prev Up
Go backward to References
Go up to Top

Footnotes

 
(1)
The coordinator's preference here would be to use `P(...)' for input and display as `P(...)'; but objections have been raised about this confusing the intension of a predicate with its extension (which is indeed an element of the indicated power set, according to the CASL semantics). Other rejected alternative include `...->? true', `...-> truth', and just listing the argument sorts (separated by `×' or by some neutral symbol such as `<>').  
(2)
We should perhaps avoid the terminology `existential equation' in the Summary, as it could get confused with existential quantification.

CoFI Document: CASL/SyntaxIssues --Version 0.99-- 17 February 1998.
Comments to cofi-language@brics.dk

Prev Up